NETMOD WG D. Bogdanovic Internet-Draft Juniper Networks Intended status: Standards Track K. Sreenivasa Expires:September 6,December 27, 2015 Brocade Communications System L. Huang Juniper Networks D. Blair Cisco SystemsMarch 5,June 25, 2015 Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Modeldraft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-02draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-03 Abstract This document describes a data model of Access Control List (ACL) basic building blocks. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire onSeptember 6,December 27, 2015. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Definitions and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Design of the ACL Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 3.1. ACL Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. ACL YANG Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56 4.1.IETF-ACLIETF Access Contorl List module . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 56 4.2. IETF-PACKET-FIELDS module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1110 4.3. An ACL Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1615 4.4. Port Range Usage Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1716 5. Linux nftables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Appendix A. Extending ACL model examples . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 A.1. Example of extending existing model for route filtering . 20 A.2. A company proprietary module example . . . . . . . . . . 22 A.3. Attaching Access Control List to interfaces . . . . . . .2524 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1. Introduction Access Control List (ACL) is one of the basic elements to configure device forwarding behavior. It is used in many networking concepts such as Policy Based Routing, Firewalls etc. An ACL is an ordered set of rules that is used to filter traffic on a networking device. Each rule is represented by an Access Control Entry (ACE). Each ACE has a group of match criteria and a group of action criteria. The match criteria consist of a tuple of packet header match criteria and metadata match criteria. o Packet header matches apply to fields visible in the packet such as address or class of service or port numbers. o Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet but not in the packet header such as input interface or overall packet length The actions specify what to do with the packet when the matching criteria is met. These actions are any operations that would apply to the packet, such as counting, policing, or simply forwarding.The list of potential actions is endless depending on the innovations of the networked devices. Access Control List is also widely knowns as ACL (pronounce as [ak-uh l]) or Access List. In this document, Access Control List, ACL and Access List are interchangeable. 1.1. Definitions and Acronyms ACE: Access Control Entry ACL: Access Control List AFI: Address Field Identifier DSCP: Differentiated Services Code Point ICMP: Internet Control Message Protocol IP: Internet Protocol IPv4: Internet Protocol version 4 IPv6: Internet Protocol version 6 MAC: Media Access Control TCP: Transmission Control Protocol 2. Problem Statement This document defines a YANG [RFC6020] data model for the configuration of ACLs. It is very important that model can be easily reused between vendors and between applications. ACL implementations in every device may vary greatly in terms of the filter constructs and actions that they support. Therefore this draft proposes a simple model that can be augmented by standard extensions and vendor proprietary models. 3. Design of the ACL Model Although different vendors have different ACL data models, there is a common understanding of what access control list (ACL) is. A network system usually have a list of ACLs, and each ACL contains an ordered list of rules, also known as access list entries - ACEs. Each ACE has a group of match criteria and a group of action criteria. The match criteria consist of packet header matching and metadata matching. Packet header matching applies to fields visible in the packet such as address or class of service or port numbers. Metadata matching applies to fields associated with the packet, but not in the packet header such as input interface, packet length, or source or destination prefix length. The actions can be any sort of operation from logging to rate limiting or dropping to simply forwarding. Actions on the first matching ACE are applied with no processing of subsequent ACEs. The model also includes a container to hold overall operational state fortheeach ACL and operational state for eachACE, targets where the ACL applied.ACE. One ACL can be applied to multiple targets within the device, such as interfaces of a networked device, applications or features running in the device, etc. When applied to interfaces of a networked device, the ACL is applied in a direction which indicates if it should be applied to packet entering (input) or leaving the device (output). An example in the appendix shows how to express it in YNAG model. This draft tries to address the commonalities between all vendors and create a common model, which can be augmented with proprietary models. The base model is very simple and with this design we hope to achieve needed flexibility for each vendor to extend the base model. 3.1. ACL Modules There are two YANG modules in the model. The first module, "ietf-acl",access-control-list", defines generic ACL aspects which are common to all ACLs regardless of their type or vendor. In effect, the module can be viewed as providing a generic ACL "superclass". It imports the second module, "ietf-packet-fields". The match container in"ietf- acl""ietf-access-control-list" uses groupings in "ietf-packet-fields".The "ietf-packet- fields" modules can easily be extendedIf there is a need toreuse definitions from other modulesdefine new "matches" choice, such as IPFIX[RFC5101] or migrate proprietary augmented module definitions into[RFC5101], thestandard module.container "matches" can be augmented. module:ietf-aclietf-access-control-list +--rw access-lists +--rwaccess-list* [access-control-list-name] +--rw access-control-list-name string +--rw access-control-list-type? access-control-list-type +--ro access-control-list-oper-data |acl* [acl-name] +--ro(targets)? | +--:(interface-name) | +--ro interface-name* stringacl-oper-data +--rw access-list-entries | +--rwaccess-list-entry*ace* [rule-name]+--rw rule-name string| +--rw matches | | +--rw(access-list-entries-type)?(ace-type)? | |+--:(access-list-entries-ip)| +--:(ace-ip) | | | | +-rw (ace-ip-version)? | | | | | +--:(ace-ipv4) | |+--rw source-port-range| | | | +--rwlower-port inet:port-numberdestination-ipv4-network? inet:ipv4-prefix | | | | | | +--rwupper-port? inet:port-numbersource-ipv4-network? inet:ipv4-prefix | | | | | +--:(ace-ipv6) | | | | | +--rwdestination-port-rangedestination-ipv6-network? inet:ipv6-prefix | | | | | +--rwlower-port inet:port-numbersource-ipv6-network? inet:ipv6-prefix | | | | | +--rwupper-port? inet:port-numberflow-label? inet:ipv6-flow-label | | | | +--rw dscp? inet:dscp | | | | +--rw protocol? uint8 | | |+--rw (access-list-entries-ip-version)? || +--rw source-port-range |+--:(access-list-entries-ipv4)| | | | +--rwdestination-ipv4-network? inet:ipv4-prefix |lower-port? inet:port-number | | |+--rw source-ipv4-network? inet:ipv4-prefix| | +--rw upper-port? inet:port-number |+--:(access-list-entries-ipv6)| | | +--rwdestination-ipv6-network? inet:ipv6-prefixdestination-port-range | | | | +--rwsource-ipv6-network? inet:ipv6-prefixlower-port? inet:port-number | | | | +--rwflow-label? inet:ipv6-flow-labelupper-port? inet:port-number | | |+--:(access-list-entries-eth)+--:(ace-eth) | | | +--rw destination-mac-address? yang:mac-address | | | +--rw destination-mac-address-mask? yang:mac-address | | | +--rw source-mac-address? yang:mac-address | | | +--rw source-mac-address-mask? yang:mac-address | | +--rw input-interface? string | | +--rwabsoluteabsolute-time | | +--rw start? yang:date-and-time | | +--rw end? yang:date-and-time | | +--rw active? boolean | +--rw actions | | +--rw (packet-handling)? | | +--:(deny) | | | +--rw deny? empty | | +--:(permit) | | +--rw permit? empty | +--roaccess-list-entries-oper-dataace-oper-data | | +--ro match-counter? yang:counter64 | +--rw rule-name string +--rw acl-name string +--rw acl-type? acl-type Figure 1 4. ACL YANG Models 4.1.IETF-ACLIETF Access Contorl List module"ietf-acl""ietf-access-control-list" is the standard top level module for Access lists.It has aThe "access-lists" containerfor "access-list" to store accessstores a listinformation. This containerof "acl". Each "acl" has information identifying the access list by aname("acl- name")name("acl-name") and a list("access-list-entries") of rules associated with the "acl-name". Each of the entries in thelist("access-list-entries")list("access-list-entries"), indexed by the string"rule-name" have"rule-name", has containers defining "matches" and "actions". The "matches" define criteria used to identify patterns in "ietf-packet-fields". The "actions" define behavior to undertake once a "match" has been identified. <CODE BEGINS>file"ietf-acl@2015-03-04.yang""ietf-access-control-list@2015-05-03.yang" moduleietf-aclietf-access-control-list { yang-version 1; namespace"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-acl";"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"; prefixaccess-control-list;acl; import ietf-yang-types { prefix"yang";yang; } import ietf-packet-fields { prefix"packet-fields";packet-fields; } organization "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/ WG List: netmod@ietf.org WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de WG Chair: Tom Nadeau tnadeau@lucidvision.com Editor: Dean Bogdanovic deanb@juniper.net Editor: Kiran Agrahara Sreenivasa kkoushik@brocade.com Editor: Lisa Huangyihuan@cisco.comlyihuang@juniper.net Editor: Dana Blair dblair@cisco.com"; description "This YANG module defines a component that describing the configuration of Access Control Lists (ACLs). Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.";// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note.revision2015-03-042015-03-17 { description "Base model for Network Access Control List (ACL)."; reference "RFC XXXX: Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model"; } identityaccess-control-list-baseacl-base { description "Baseaccess control listAccess Control List type for allaccess control listAccess Control List type identifiers."; } identityIP-access-control-listip-acl { base"access-control-list:access-control-list-base";acl:acl-base; description"IP-access control list"IP Access Control List is a common name forlayerlists that contain layer 3andand/or layer 4access control list types. It is common among vendors to call 3-tupple or 5 tupple IP access control lists";match conditions."; } identityeth-access-control-listeth-acl { base"access-control-list:access-control-list-base";acl:acl-base; description "Ethernetaccess control listAccess Control List is name for layer 2 Ethernet technologyaccess control listAccess Control List types, like 10/100/1000baseT or WiFiaccess control list";Access Control List"; } typedefaccess-control-list-typeacl-type { type identityref { base"access-control-list-base";acl-base; } description "This type is used to refer to an Access Control List (ACL) type"; } typedef access-control-list-ref { type leafref { path"/access-lists/access-list/access-control-list-name";"/access-lists/acl/acl-name"; } description "This type is used by data models that need toreferencedreference anaccess control list";Access Control List"; } container access-lists { description "This is a top level container for Access Control Lists. It can have one or more Access ControlList.";Lists."; listaccess-listacl { keyaccess-control-list-name;"acl-name"; description "Anaccess list (acl)Access Control List(ACL) is an ordered list ofaccess list entriesAccess List Entries (ACE). Eachaccess control entriesAccess Control Entry has a list of matchcriteria,criteria and a list of actions. Since there are several kinds ofaccess control listsAccess Control Lists implemented with different attributes foreach anddifferentfor each vendor,vendors, this model accommodates customizingaccess control listsAccess Control Lists for each kind and for each vendor.";leaf access-control-list-name { type string; description "The name of access-list. A device MAY restrict the length and value of this name, possibly space and special characters are not allowed."; } leaf access-control-list-type { type access-control-list-type; description "Type of access control list. When this type is not explicitely specified, if vendor implementation permits, the access control entires in the list can be mixed, by containing L2, L3 and L4 entries"; }containeraccess-control-list-oper-dataacl-oper-data { config false; description "Overallaccess control listAccess Control List operational data";choice targets{ description "List of targets where access control list is applied"; leaf-list interface-name { type string; description "Interfaces where access control list is applied"; } }} container access-list-entries { description "The access-list-entries container contains a list ofaccess-list-entry(ACE).";access-list-entries(ACE)."; listaccess-list-entryace { keyrule-name;"rule-name"; ordered-by user; description "List of access list entries(ACE)";leaf rule-name { type string; description "Entry name."; }container matches { description"Define"Definitions for matchcriteria";criteria for this Access List Entry."; choiceaccess-list-entries-typeace-type { description "Type of access list entry."; caseaccess-list-entries-ipace-ip {uses packet-fields:access-control-list-ip-header-fields;description "IP Access List Entry."; choiceaccess-list-entries-ip-versionace-ip-version { description"Choice of IP version.";"IP version used in this Acess List Entry."; caseaccess-list-entries-ipv4ace-ipv4 { usespacket-fields:access-control-list-ipv4-header-fields;packet-fields:acl-ipv4-header-fields; } caseaccess-list-entries-ipv6ace-ipv6 { usespacket-fields:access-control-list-ipv6-header-fields;packet-fields:acl-ipv6-header-fields; } } uses packet-fields:acl-ip-header-fields; } caseaccess-list-entries-ethace-eth { description "EthernetMAC addressAccess List entry."; usespacket-fields:access-control-list-eth-header-fields;packet-fields:acl-eth-header-fields; } } uses packet-fields:metadata; } container actions { description"Define"Definitions of actioncriteria";criteria for this Access List Entry."; choice packet-handling { defaultdeny;"deny"; description "Packet handling action."; case deny { leaf deny { type empty; description "Deny action."; } } case permit { leaf permit { type empty; description "Permit action."; } } } } containeraccess-list-entries-oper-dataace-oper-data { config false; description"Per access list entries operational data";"Operational data for this Access List Entry."; leaf match-counter { type yang:counter64; description "Number of matches foran access list entry";this Access List Entry"; } } leaf rule-name { type string; description "A unique name identifying this Access List Entry(ACE)."; } } } leaf acl-name { type string; description "The name of access-list. A device MAY restrict the length and value of this name, possibly space and special characters are not allowed."; } leaf acl-type { type acl-type; description "It is recommended to have an Access Control List with uniform access list entries, all of the same type. When this type is not explicitly specified, if vendor implementation permits, the access control entries in the list can be mixed, by containing L2, L3 and L4 entries"; } } } } <CODE ENDS> 4.2. IETF-PACKET-FIELDS module The packet fields module defines the necessary groups for matching on fields in the packet including ethernet, ipv4, ipv6, transport layer fields and metadata.These groupings can be augmented to include other proprietary matching criteria.Since the number of match criteria is very large, the base draft does not include these directly but references them by "uses" to keep the base module simple. In case more match conditions are needed, those can be added by augmenting choices within container "matches" in ietf-access-control-list.yang model <CODE BEGINS>file"ietf-packet-fields@2015-03-04.yang""ietf-packet-fields@2015-06-11.yang" module ietf-packet-fields { yang-version 1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-packet-fields"; prefix packet-fields; import ietf-inet-types { prefix"inet";inet; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix"yang";yang; } organization "IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/ WG List: netmod@ietf.org WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de WG Chair: Tom Nadeau tnadeau@lucidvision.com Editor: Dean Bogdanovic deanb@juniper.net Editor: Kiran Agrahara Sreenivasa kkoushik@brocade.com Editor: Lisa Huangyihuan@cisco.comlyihuang@juniper.net Editor: Dana Blair dblair@cisco.com"; description "This YANG module defines groupings that are used byietf-acl butietf-access-control-list YANG module. Their usage is not limited toacl.ietf-access-control-list and can be used anywhere as applicable. Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices.";// RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this // note.revision2015-03-042015-06-11 { description "Initial version of packet fields used byaccess-lists";ietf-access-control-list"; reference "RFC XXXX: Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model"; } groupingaccess-control-list-transport-header-fieldsacl-transport-header-fields { description "Transport header fields"; container source-port-range { description"inclusive"Inclusive rangeofrepresenting sourceports";ports to be used. When only lower-port is present, it represents a single port."; leaf lower-port { type inet:port-number; mandatory true; description "Lowerboundary.";boundary for port."; } leaf upper-port { must ". >= ../lower-port" { error-message "The upper-port must be greater than or equal to lower-port"; } type inet:port-number; description "Upperboundary.boundary for port . Ifexist,existing, the upper port must be greater or equal tolower port.";lower-port."; } } container destination-port-range { description"inclusive"Inclusive rangeofrepresenting destinationports";ports to be used. When only lower-port is present, it represents a single port."; leaf lower-port { type inet:port-number; mandatory true; description "Lowerboundary.";boundary for port."; } leaf upper-port { must ". >= ../lower-port" { error-message "The upper-port must be greater than or equal to lower-port"; } type inet:port-number; description "Upperboundary.";boundary for port. If existing, the upper port must be greater or equal to lower-port"; } } } groupingaccess-control-list-ip-header-fieldsacl-ip-header-fields { description"Header"IP header fields common to ipv4 and ipv6";uses access-control-list-transport-header-fields;leaf dscp { type inet:dscp; description "Value of dscp."; } leaf protocol { type uint8; description "Internet Protocol number."; } uses acl-transport-header-fields; } groupingaccess-control-list-ipv4-header-fieldsacl-ipv4-header-fields { description"fields"Fields in IPv4header";header."; leaf destination-ipv4-network { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description"One or more ip addresses.";"Destination IPv4 address prefix."; } leaf source-ipv4-network { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description"One or more ip addresses.";"Source IPv4 address prefix."; } } groupingaccess-control-list-ipv6-header-fieldsacl-ipv6-header-fields { description"fields"Fields in IPv6 header"; leaf destination-ipv6-network { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description"One or more ip addresses.";"Destination IPv6 address prefix."; } leaf source-ipv6-network { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description"One or more ip addresses.";"Source IPv6 address prefix."; } leaf flow-label { type inet:ipv6-flow-label; description"Flow"IPv6 Flow label."; } reference "RFC 4291: IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture RFC 4007: IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture RFC 5952: A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation"; } groupingaccess-control-list-eth-header-fieldsacl-eth-header-fields { description"fields"Fields inethernet header";Ethernet header."; leaf destination-mac-address { type yang:mac-address; description"Mac addresses.";"Destination IEEE 802 MAC address."; } leaf destination-mac-address-mask { type yang:mac-address; description"Mac addresses"Destination IEEE 802 MAC address mask."; } leaf source-mac-address { type yang:mac-address; description"Mac addresses.";"Source IEEE 802 MAC address."; } leaf source-mac-address-mask { type yang:mac-address; description"Mac addresses"Source IEEE 802 MAC address mask."; } reference "IEEE 802: IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Overview and Architecture."; } grouping timerange { description "Time range contains time segments to allow access-control-list to be active/inactive when the system time iswithinbetween thetime segments.";range."; containerabsoluteabsolute-time { description "Absolute time and date that the associated function starts going into effect."; leaf start { type yang:date-and-time; description"Start"Absolute start time and date"; } leaf end { type yang:date-and-time; description "Absolute end time and date"; } leaf active { type boolean; default "true"; description"Specify"This object indicates whether theassociated function activethe ACL will be active(true) orinactive state when starts going into effect";inactive(false) during this time range."; } }// container absolute}//grouping timerangegrouping metadata { description "Fields associated with a packetbutwhick are not in theheader";header."; leaf input-interface { type string; description "Packet was received on thisinterface";interface."; } uses timerange; } } <CODE ENDS> 4.3. An ACL Example Requirement: Deny All traffic from 10.10.10.1 bound for host 10.10.10.255 from leaving. In order to achieve the requirement, an nameaccess control listAccess Control List is needed. The acl and aces can be described in CLI as the following: access-list ipiaclsample-ip-acl deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 host 10.10.10.255Figure 1Here is the example acl configuration xml: <rpc message-id="101"xmlns:nc="urn:cisco:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-acl:1.0"> // replace with IANA namespace when assignedxmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <edit-config> <target> <running/> </target> <config><top xmlns="http://example.com/schema/1.2/config"> <access-lists> <access-list> <access-control-list-name>sample-ip-acl</access-control-list-name><access-lists "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-acl:1.0"> <acl> <acl-name>sample-ip-acl</acl-name> <access-list-entries><access-list-entry> <rule-name>telnet-block-rule</rule-name><ace> <rule-name>rule1</rule-name> <matches><destination-ipv4-address>10.10.10.255/24</destination-ipv4-address> <source-ipv4-address>10.10.10.1/24</source-ipv4-address><destination-ipv4-network> 10.10.10.255/24 </destination-ipv4-network> <source-ipv4-network> 10.10.10.1/24 </source-ipv4-network> </matches> <actions> <deny/> </actions></access-list-entry></ace> </access-list-entries></access-list></acl> </access-lists></top></config> </edit-config> </rpc>Figure 24.4. Port Range Usage Example When a lower-port and an upper-port are both present, it represents a range between lower-port and upper-port with both the lower-port and upper-port are included. When only a lower-port presents, it represents a single port. With the follow XML snippet: <source-port-range> <lower-port>16384</lower-port> <upper-port>16387</upper-port> </source-port-range> This represents source ports 16384,16385, 16386, and 16387. With the follow XML snippet: <source-port-range> <lower-port>16384</lower-port> <upper-port>65535</upper-port> </source-port-range> This represents source ports greater than/equal to 16384. With the follow XML snippet: <source-port-range> <lower-port>21</lower-port> </source-port-range> This represents port 21. 5. Linux nftables As Linux platform is becoming more popular as networking platform, the Linux data model is changing. Previously ACLs in Linux were highly protocol specific and different utilities were usedfor it(iptables, ip6tables, arptables,ebtables).ebtables), so each one had separate data model. Recently, this has changed and a single utility, nftables, has beenprovided. This utilitydeveloped. With a single application, it has a single data model for filewall filters and it follows very similarly to thesame base model asietf-access- control list module proposed in this draft. The nftables support input and output ACEs and each ACE can be defined with match and action. In the example below, it shows nftable configuration that accepts and count packets. It contains a table ip filter { chain output { type filter hook output priority 0; counter packets 1 bytes 84 accept } } There are many similarities between Linux nftables and IETF ACL YANG data models. It should be fairly easy to do translation between ACL YANG model described in this draft and Linux nftables. 6. Security Considerations The YANG module defined in this memo is designed to be accessed via the NETCONF protocol [RFC6241] [RFC6241]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is SSH [RFC6242] [RFC6242]. The NETCONF access control model [RFC6536] [RFC6536] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF users to a pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in the YANG module which are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., <edit-config>) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/ vulnerability:/ietf-acl:access-lists/access-list/access-list-entries:/access-lists/acl/access-list-entries: This list specifies all the configured access list entries on the device. Unauthorized write access to this list can allow intruders to access and control the system. Unauthorized read access to this list can allow intruders to spoof packets with authorized addresses thereby compromising the system. 7. IANA Considerations This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688] [RFC3688]. Following the format in RFC 3688, the following registration is requested to be made: URI:urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-aclurn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-packet-fields Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC6020]. name:ietf-aclietf-access-control-list namespace:urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-aclurn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list prefix: ietf-acl reference: RFC XXXX name: ietf-packet-fields namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf- packet-fields prefix: ietf-packet-fields reference: RFC XXXX 8. Acknowledgements Alex Clemm, Andy Bierman and Lisa Huang started it by sketching out an initial IETF draft in several past IETF meetings. That draft included an ACL YANG model structure and a rich set of match filters, and acknowledged contributions by Louis Fourie, Dana Blair, Tula Kraiser, Patrick Gili, George Serpa, Martin Bjorklund, Kent Watsen, and Phil Shafer. Many people have reviewed the various earlier drafts that made the draft went into IETF charter. Dean Bogdanovic, Kiran Agrahara Sreenivasa, Lisa Huang, and Dana Blair each evaluated the YANG model in previous draft separately and then work together, to created a new ACL draft that can be supported by different vendors. The new draft removes vendor specific features, and gives examples to allow vendors to extend in their own proprietary ACL. The earlier draft was superseded with the new one that received more participation from many vendors. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, October 2010. [RFC6241] Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., and A. Bierman, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, June 2011. [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, June 2011. [RFC6536] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Access Control Model", RFC 6536, March 2012. 9.2. Informative References [RFC5101] Claise, B., "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information", RFC 5101, January 2008. Appendix A. Extending ACL model examples A.1. Example of extending existing model for route filtering With proposed modular design, it is easy to extend the model with other features. Those features can be standard features, like route filters. Route filters match on specific IP addresses or ranges of prefixes. Much like ACLs, they include some match criteria and corresponding match action(s). For that reason, it is very simple to extend existing ACL model with route filtering. The combination of a route prefix and prefix length along with the type of match determines how route filters are evaluated against incoming routes. Different vendors have different match types and in this model we are using only ones that are common across all vendors participating in this draft. As in this example, the base ACL model can be extended with company proprietary extensions, described in the next section.<CODE BEGINS>file"std-ext-route-filter@2015-02-14.yang""example-ext-route-filter@2015-02-14.yang" modulestd-ext-route-filterexample-ext-route-filter { yang-version 1; namespace"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-route-filter";"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:example-ext-route-filter"; prefixstd-ext-route-filter;example-ext-route-filter; import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; } importietf-aclietf-access-control-list { prefix "ietf-acl"; } organization"IETF NETMOD (NETCONF Data Modeling Language) Working Group";"Route modele group."; contact"WG Web: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/ WG List: netmod@ietf.org WG Chair: Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de WG Chair: Tom Nadeau tnadeau@lucidvision.com Editor: Dean Bogdanovic deanb@juniper.net Editor: Kiran Agrahara Sreenivasa kkoushik@brocade.com Editor: Lisa Huang yihuan@cisco.com Editor: Dana Blair dblair@cisco.com";"abc@abc.com"; description " This module describes route filter as a collection of match prefixes. When specifying a match prefix, you can specify an exact match with a particular route or a less precise match. You can configure either a common action that applies to the entire list or an action associated with each prefix. "; revision2015-02-142015-05-03 { description"creating"Creating Route-Filter extension model based onietf-aclietf-access-control-list model"; reference " "; } augment"/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list /ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:matches"{"/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:ace/ietf-acl:matches"{ description " This module augments the matches container in the ietf-acl module with route filter specific actions "; choice route-prefix{ description "Define route filter match criteria"; case range { description " Route falls between the lower prefix/prefix-length and theupper prefix/prefix-length. ";upperprefix/prefix-length."; choice ipv4-range { description "Defines thelowerIPv4prefix/prefixprefix range"; leaf v4-lower-bound { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description "Defines the lower IPv4 prefix/prefix length"; } leaf v4-upper-bound { type inet:ipv4-prefix; description "Defines the upper IPv4 prefix/prefix length"; } } choice ipv6-range { description "Defines the IPv6 prefix/prefix range"; leaf v6-lower-bound { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "Defines the lower IPv6 prefix/prefix length"; } leaf v6-upper-bound { type inet:ipv6-prefix; description "Defines the upper IPv6 prefix/prefix length"; } } } } } }<CODE ENDS>A.2. A company proprietary module example Module"newco-acl""example-newco-acl" is an example of company proprietary model that augments "ietf-acl" module. It shows how to use 'augment' with an XPath expression to add additional match criteria, action criteria, and default actions when no ACE matches found. All these are company proprietary extensions or system feature extensions."newco-acl""example-newco-acl" is just an example and it is expected from vendors to create their own proprietary models. The following figure is the tree structure ofnewco-acl.example-newco-acl. In this example,ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list/ietf-acl:access- list-entries/ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:matches:/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:access- list-entries/ ietf-acl:ace/ietf-acl:matches are augmented with a new choice, protocol-payload-choice. Theprotocol- payload-choiceprotocol-payload-choice uses a grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. In other example,ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl :access-list/ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ ietf-acl:actions/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:access- list-entries/ ietf-acl:ace/ietf-acl:actions are augmented with new choice of actions. module:newco-aclexample-newco-acl augment/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list /ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:matches:/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:ace/ietf-acl:matches: +--rw (protocol-payload-choice)? +--:(protocol-payload) +--rw protocol-payload* [value-keyword] +--rw value-keyword enumeration augment/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list /ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:actions:/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:ace/ietf-acl:actions: +--rw (action)? +--:(count) | +--rw count? string +--:(policer) | +--rw policer? string +--:(hiearchical-policer) +--rw hierarchitacl-policer? string augment/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list:/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl: +--rw default-actions +--rw deny? empty<CODE BEGINS>file "newco-acl@2015-03-04.yang" modulenewco-aclexample-newco-acl { yang-version 1; namespace"urn:newco:params:xml:ns:yang:newco-acl";"urn:newco:params:xml:ns:yang:example-newco-acl"; prefixnewco-acl;example-newco-acl; import ietf-acl { prefix "ietf-acl"; } revision2015-03-04{2015-05-03{ description"creating"Creating NewCo proprietary extensions to ietf-acl model"; } augment "/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list /ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:matches" { description "Newco proprietary simple filter matches"; choice protocol-payload-choice { list protocol-payload { key value-keyword; ordered-by user; description "Match protocol payload"; uses match-simple-payload-protocol-value; } } } augment"/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list/ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ietf-acl:actions""/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list/ ietf-acl:access-list-entries/ietf-acl:access-list-entry/ ietf-acl:actions" { description "Newco proprietary simple filter actions"; choice action { case count { description "Count the packet in the named counter"; leaf count { type string; } } case policer { description "Name of policer to use to rate-limit traffic"; leaf policer { type string; } } case hiearchical-policer { description "Name of hierarchical policer to use to rate-limit traffic"; leaf hierarchitacl-policer{ type string; } } } } augment "/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:access-list" { container default-actions { description "Actions that occur if no access-list entry is matched."; leaf deny { type empty; } } } grouping match-simple-payload-protocol-value { leaf value-keyword { description "(null)"; type enumeration { enum icmp { description "Internet Control Message Protocol"; } enum icmp6 { description "Internet Control Message Protocol Version 6"; } enum range { description "Range of values"; } } } } }<CODE ENDS>Draft authors expect that different vendors will provide their own yang models as in the example above, which is theextensionaugmentation of the base model A.3. Attaching Access Control List to interfaces Access control list typically does not exist in isolation. Instead, they are associated with a certain scope in which they are applied, for example, an interface of a set of interfaces. How to attach anSPFaccess control list to an interface (or other system artifact) is outside the scope of this model, as it depends on the specifics of the system model that is being applied. However, in general, the general design pattern will involved adding adadadata node with a reference, or set of references, to ACLs that are to be applied to the interface. For this purpose, the type definition"access-control-list-ref""access- control-list-ref" can be used. This is an example of attaching anaccess control listAccess Control List to an interface.<CODE BEGINS> file "interface model augmentation with ACL @2015-03-04.yang"importietf-aclietf-access-control-list { prefix "ietf-acl"; } import ietf-interface { prefix "ietf-if"; } import ietf-yang-types { prefix "yang"; } augment "/ietf-if:interfaces/ietf-if:interface" { description "ApplyaclACL to interfaces"; container acl{ description "ACL related properties."; leaf acl-name { typeietf-acl:access-control-list-ref;ietf-acl:acl-ref; mandatory true; description "Access Control List name."; } leaf match-counter { type yang:counter64; config false; description "Total match count foraccess control list ";Access Control List on this interface"; } choice direction { leaf in { type empty;} leaf out { type empty;} } } }<CODE ENDS>augment "/ietf-acl:access-lists/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:acl-oper-data" { description "This is an example on how to apply acl to a target to collect operational data"; container targets{ choice interface{ leaf-list interface-name{ type ietf-if:interface-ref; } } } } Authors' Addresses Dean Bogdanovic Juniper Networks Email: deanb@juniper.net Kiran Agrahara Sreenivasa Brocade Communications System Email: kkoushik@brocade.com Lisa HuangCisco SystemsJuniper Networks Email:yihuan@cisco.comlyihuang@juniper.net Dana Blair Cisco Systems Email: dblair@cisco.com