draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17.txt | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-18.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
IDR S. Previdi, Ed. | IDR S. Previdi, Ed. | |||
Internet-Draft C. Filsfils | Internet-Draft C. Filsfils | |||
Intended status: Standards Track A. Lindem, Ed. | Intended status: Standards Track A. Lindem, Ed. | |||
Expires: August 24, 2018 Cisco Systems | Expires: September 28, 2018 Cisco Systems | |||
A. Sreekantiah | A. Sreekantiah | |||
H. Gredler | H. Gredler | |||
RtBrick Inc. | RtBrick Inc. | |||
February 20, 2018 | March 27, 2018 | |||
Segment Routing Prefix SID extensions for BGP | Segment Routing Prefix SID extensions for BGP | |||
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-17 | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-18 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a node to steer a packet | The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows a node to steer a packet | |||
flow through any topological path and service chain by leveraging | flow through any topological path and service chain by leveraging | |||
source routing. The ingress node prepends an SR header to a packet | source routing. The ingress node prepends an SR header to a packet | |||
containing a set of segment identifiers (SID). Each SID represents a | containing a set of segment identifiers (SID). Each SID represents a | |||
topological or a service-based instruction. Per-flow state is | topological or a service-based instruction. Per-flow state is | |||
maintained only on the ingress node of the SR domain. | maintained only on the ingress node of the SR domain. | |||
skipping to change at page 2, line 7 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 7 ¶ | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 24, 2018. | This Internet-Draft will expire on September 28, 2018. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
skipping to change at page 9, line 23 ¶ | skipping to change at page 9, line 23 ¶ | |||
If multiple different prefixes are received with the same label | If multiple different prefixes are received with the same label | |||
index, all of the different prefixes MUST have their BGP Prefix-SID | index, all of the different prefixes MUST have their BGP Prefix-SID | |||
attribute considered as "conflicting". | attribute considered as "conflicting". | |||
If multiple valid paths for the same prefix are received from | If multiple valid paths for the same prefix are received from | |||
multiple BGP speakers or, in the case of [RFC7911], from the same BGP | multiple BGP speakers or, in the case of [RFC7911], from the same BGP | |||
speaker, and the BGP Prefix-SID attributes do not contain the same | speaker, and the BGP Prefix-SID attributes do not contain the same | |||
label index, then the label index from the best path BGP Prefix-SID | label index, then the label index from the best path BGP Prefix-SID | |||
attribute SHOULD be chosen with a notable exception being when | attribute SHOULD be chosen with a notable exception being when | |||
[RFC5005] is being used to dampen route changes. | [RFC5004] is being used to dampen route changes. | |||
When a BGP speaker receives a path from a neighbor with an | When a BGP speaker receives a path from a neighbor with an | |||
"acceptable" BGP Prefix-SID attribute and that path is selected as | "acceptable" BGP Prefix-SID attribute and that path is selected as | |||
the best path, it SHOULD program the derived label as the label for | the best path, it SHOULD program the derived label as the label for | |||
the prefix in its local MPLS dataplane. | the prefix in its local MPLS dataplane. | |||
When a BGP speaker receives a path from a neighbor with an "invalid" | When a BGP speaker receives a path from a neighbor with an "invalid" | |||
or "conflicting" BGP Prefix-SID attribute or when a BGP speaker | or "conflicting" BGP Prefix-SID attribute or when a BGP speaker | |||
receives a path from a neighbor with a BGP Prefix-SID attribute but | receives a path from a neighbor with a BGP Prefix-SID attribute but | |||
is unable to process it (e.g., local policy disables the | is unable to process it (e.g., local policy disables the | |||
skipping to change at page 14, line 25 ¶ | skipping to change at page 14, line 25 ¶ | |||
12.1. Normative References | 12.1. Normative References | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing] | [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing] | |||
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., | Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., | |||
Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing | Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing | |||
Architecture", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-15 (work | Architecture", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-15 (work | |||
in progress), January 2018. | in progress), January 2018. | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] | [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] | |||
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., | Bashandy, A., Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., | |||
Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with MPLS | Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with MPLS | |||
data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-11 | data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-12 | |||
(work in progress), October 2017. | (work in progress), February 2018. | |||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc- | DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc- | |||
editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A | [RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A | |||
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, | Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, <https://www.rfc- | DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006, <https://www.rfc- | |||
editor.org/info/rfc4271>. | editor.org/info/rfc4271>. | |||
skipping to change at page 15, line 34 ¶ | skipping to change at page 15, line 34 ¶ | |||
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] | [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] | |||
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., | Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., | |||
and M. Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment | and M. Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment | |||
Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 | Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 | |||
(work in progress), January 2018. | (work in progress), January 2018. | |||
[I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe] | [I-D.ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe] | |||
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Patel, K., Ray, S., and J. | Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Patel, K., Ray, S., and J. | |||
Dong, "BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress | Dong, "BGP-LS extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress | |||
Peer Engineering", draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing- | Peer Engineering", draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing- | |||
epe-14 (work in progress), December 2017. | epe-15 (work in progress), March 2018. | |||
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc] | [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc] | |||
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Mitchell, J., Aries, E., and P. | Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Mitchell, J., Aries, E., and P. | |||
Lapukhov, "BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data | Lapukhov, "BGP-Prefix Segment in large-scale data | |||
centers", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08 (work | centers", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08 (work | |||
in progress), December 2017. | in progress), December 2017. | |||
[IANA-MPLS-SPECIAL-LABEL] | [IANA-MPLS-SPECIAL-LABEL] | |||
"IANA Special-Purpose Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) | "IANA Special-Purpose Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) | |||
Label Values Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ | Label Values Registry", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ | |||
mpls-label-values/>. | mpls-label-values/>. | |||
[RFC5005] Nottingham, M., "Feed Paging and Archiving", RFC 5005, | [RFC5004] Chen, E. and S. Sangli, "Avoid BGP Best Path Transitions | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC5005, September 2007, <https://www.rfc- | from One External to Another", RFC 5004, | |||
editor.org/info/rfc5005>. | DOI 10.17487/RFC5004, September 2007, <https://www.rfc- | |||
editor.org/info/rfc5004>. | ||||
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and | [RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and | |||
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and | S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and | |||
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752, | Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016, <https://www.rfc- | DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016, <https://www.rfc- | |||
editor.org/info/rfc7752>. | editor.org/info/rfc7752>. | |||
Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
Stefano Previdi (editor) | Stefano Previdi (editor) | |||
End of changes. 9 change blocks. | ||||
12 lines changed or deleted | 13 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |