--- 1/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt 2019-10-15 02:13:12.142467419 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-09.txt 2019-10-15 02:13:12.186468538 -0700 @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ IDR Working Group J. Tantsura Internet-Draft Apstra, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track U. Chunduri -Expires: March 19, 2020 Futurewei Technologies +Expires: April 17, 2020 Futurewei Technologies K. Talaulikar Cisco Systems G. Mirsky ZTE Corp. N. Triantafillis Apstra, Inc. - September 16, 2019 + October 15, 2019 Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using Border Gateway Protocol Link- State - draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08 + draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-09 Abstract This document defines a way for a Border Gateway Protocol Link-State (BGP-LS) speaker to advertise multiple types of supported Maximum SID Depths (MSDs) at node and/or link granularity. Such advertisements allow entities (e.g., centralized controllers) to determine whether a particular Segment Identifier (SID) stack can be supported in a given network. @@ -33,21 +33,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on March 19, 2020. + This Internet-Draft will expire on April 17, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -359,46 +359,45 @@ . [RFC8491] Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Aldrin, S., and L. Ginsberg, "Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using IS-IS", RFC 8491, DOI 10.17487/RFC8491, November 2018, . 10.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-model] - Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., and S. Hares, "BGP YANG Model - for Service Provider Networks", draft-ietf-idr-bgp- - model-06 (work in progress), June 2019. + Jethanandani, M., Patel, K., Hares, S., and J. Haas, "BGP + YANG Model for Service Provider Networks", draft-ietf-idr- + bgp-model-07 (work in progress), October 2019. [I-D.ietf-idr-rfc7752bis] - Talaulikar, K., Gredler, H., Medved, J., Previdi, S., - Farrel, A., and S. Ray, "Distribution of Link-State and - Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP", draft-ietf- - idr-rfc7752bis-00 (work in progress), September 2019. + Talaulikar, K., "Distribution of Link-State and Traffic + Engineering Information Using BGP", draft-ietf-idr- + rfc7752bis-01 (work in progress), September 2019. [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] Xu, X., Kini, S., Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., and S. Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls- - elc-08 (work in progress), September 2019. + elc-09 (work in progress), October 2019. [I-D.ietf-isis-sr-yang] Litkowski, S., Qu, Y., Sarkar, P., Chen, I., and J. Tantsura, "YANG Data Model for IS-IS Segment Routing", draft-ietf-isis-sr-yang-06 (work in progress), July 2019. [I-D.ietf-ospf-mpls-elc] Xu, X., Kini, S., Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., and S. Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF", draft-ietf-ospf- - mpls-elc-09 (work in progress), September 2019. + mpls-elc-10 (work in progress), October 2019. [I-D.ietf-ospf-sr-yang] Yeung, D., Qu, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, I., and A. Lindem, "YANG Data Model for OSPF SR (Segment Routing) Protocol", draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-10 (work in progress), August 2019. [I-D.ietf-pce-segment-routing] Sivabalan, S., Filsfils, C., Tantsura, J., Henderickx, W., and J. Hardwick, "PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing",