--- 1/draft-ietf-idr-aigp-06.txt 2011-12-12 18:13:57.254670853 +0100 +++ 2/draft-ietf-idr-aigp-07.txt 2011-12-12 18:13:57.286670722 +0100 @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ Network Working Group Pradosh Mohapatra Internet Draft Rex Fernando Intended Status: Proposed Standard Eric C. Rosen -Expires: December 23, 2011 Cisco Systems, Inc. +Expires: June 12, 2012 Cisco Systems, Inc. James Uttaro ATT - June 23, 2011 + December 12, 2011 The Accumulated IGP Metric Attribute for BGP - draft-ietf-idr-aigp-06.txt + draft-ietf-idr-aigp-07.txt Abstract Routing protocols that have been designed to run within a single administrative domain ("IGPs") generally do so by assigning a metric to each link, and then choosing as the installed path between two nodes the path for which the total distance (sum of the metric of each link along the path) is minimized. BGP, designed to provide routing over a large number of independent administrative domains ("autonomous systems"), does not make its path selection decisions @@ -536,18 +536,18 @@ 10. Normative References [BGP], "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", Y. Rekhter, T. Li, S. Hares, RFC 4271, January 2006. 11. Informative References [ADDPATH] "Fast Connectivity Restoration Using BGP Add-Path", P. Mohapatra, R. Fernando, C. Filsfils, R. Raszuk, draft-pmohapat-idr- - fast-conn-restore-01.txt, March 2011. + fast-conn-restore-02.txt, October 2011. [BESTEXT], "Advertisement of the Best External Route in BGP", P. Marques, R. Fernando, E. Chen, P. Mohapatra, H. Gredler, draft-ietf- idr-best-external-04.txt, April 2011. [RFC2119] "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels.", S. Bradner, March 1997.