draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-02.txt   draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-03.txt 
6lo P. Thubert, Ed. 6lo P. Thubert, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco Internet-Draft Cisco
Updates: 4944 (if approved) R. Cragie Updates: 4944 (if approved) R. Cragie
Intended status: Standards Track ARM Intended status: Standards Track ARM
Expires: January 19, 2017 July 18, 2016 Expires: January 21, 2017 July 20, 2016
6LoWPAN Paging Dispatch 6LoWPAN Paging Dispatch
draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-02 draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-03
Abstract Abstract
This specification introduces a new context switch mechanism for This specification updates RFC 4944 to introduce a new context switch
6LoWPAN compression, expressed in terms of Pages and signaled by a mechanism for 6LoWPAN compression, expressed in terms of Pages and
new Paging Dispatch. signaled by a new Paging Dispatch.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 19, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on January 21, 2017.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 5, line 18 skipping to change at page 5, line 18
from 11 110000 through 11 111111 and represent Page Numbers 0 through from 11 110000 through 11 111111 and represent Page Numbers 0 through
15 as discussed in this document. 15 as discussed in this document.
6.2. New Per-Page Dispatch Type registries 6.2. New Per-Page Dispatch Type registries
This document creates 15 new IANA registries for the Per-Page This document creates 15 new IANA registries for the Per-Page
Dispatch type fields, indexed by Page Number, 1 to 15. Each Registry Dispatch type fields, indexed by Page Number, 1 to 15. Each Registry
corresponds to a bit-field of one octet. corresponds to a bit-field of one octet.
Future assignments in these registries are to be coordinated via IANA Future assignments in these registries are to be coordinated via IANA
under the policy of "Specification Required" [RFC2434]. It is under the policy of "Specification Required" [RFC5226]. It is
expected that this policy will allow for other (non-IETF) expected that this policy will allow for other (non-IETF)
organizations to more easily obtain assignments. organizations to more easily obtain assignments.
These registries extend the Dispatch type field registry that was These registries extend the Dispatch type field registry that was
created for [RFC4944], which is considered as the registry for Page created for [RFC4944], which is considered as the registry for Page
0. 0.
As described above, this document allocates in the registry As described above, this document allocates in the registry
associated to Page 1 the Per-Page Dispatch type field values that are associated to Page 1 the Per-Page Dispatch type field values that are
allocated in the Dispatch type field for LOWPAN_IPHC by [RFC6282]. allocated in the Dispatch type field for LOWPAN_IPHC by [RFC6282].
skipping to change at page 5, line 48 skipping to change at page 5, line 48
the design in the 6lo Working Group. the design in the 6lo Working Group.
8. References 8. References
8.1. Normative References 8.1. Normative References
[IEEE802154] [IEEE802154]
IEEE standard for Information Technology, "IEEE std. IEEE standard for Information Technology, "IEEE std.
802.15.4, Part. 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) 802.15.4, Part. 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC)
and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate
Wireless Personal Area Networks", 2015. Wireless Personal Area Networks".
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", RFC 2434,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2434, October 1998,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2434>.
[RFC4944] Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D. Culler, [RFC4944] Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., and D. Culler,
"Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4
Networks", RFC 4944, DOI 10.17487/RFC4944, September 2007, Networks", RFC 4944, DOI 10.17487/RFC4944, September 2007,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4944>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4944>.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5226, May 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.
[RFC6282] Hui, J., Ed. and P. Thubert, "Compression Format for IPv6 [RFC6282] Hui, J., Ed. and P. Thubert, "Compression Format for IPv6
Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks", RFC 6282, Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks", RFC 6282,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6282, September 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6282, September 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6282>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6282>.
8.2. Informative References 8.2. Informative References
[RFC7102] Vasseur, JP., "Terms Used in Routing for Low-Power and [RFC7102] Vasseur, JP., "Terms Used in Routing for Low-Power and
Lossy Networks", RFC 7102, DOI 10.17487/RFC7102, January Lossy Networks", RFC 7102, DOI 10.17487/RFC7102, January
2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7102>. 2014, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7102>.
 End of changes. 8 change blocks. 
13 lines changed or deleted 13 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/